Skip Navigation

Strengthening the evidence base for maternal and child health programs

New: MCH Best strategies database for sample ESMs

Evidence Tools
MCH Best. NPM 13.2: Preventive Dental Visit: Childhood

MCH Best Logo young girl receiving oral health exam

Strategy. Provision of Information about Teledentistry

Approach. Provide information about opportunities and barriers related to teledentistry (e.g., state statutes, practice acts, reimbursement policies) to key state and/or local oral health stakeholders.

Return to main MCH Best page >>

Overview. States and jurisdictions contemplating the use of teledentistry could benefit from an understanding of the science behind the practice as well as opprotunities and barriers assosiated with teledentistry. Providing information about services is an evidence-based strategy that has shown utility in increasing use of professional services other than oral health by MCH population groups. While limited research has been conducted to verify results with populations in need of oral health services, this research can serve as a proxy to gauge effect.1

Evidence. Expert opinion. Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts and are consistent with accepted theoretical frameworks. However, the strategies have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects. This strategy was drawn from Holt K, Louie R. 2019. Strengthening State and Jurisdiction Efforts Related to Title V Maternal and Child Health National Performance Measure 13 (Oral Health). Washington, DC: National Maternal and Child Oral Health Resource Center. This expert opinion is based on multiple resources.2 (Read more about understanding evidence ratings).

Telemedicine has been shown by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to be scientifically supported. In addition, systematic reviews have established teledentistry as an equally effective practice.3

Target Audience. Key stakeholders may include the state MCH program; the state oral health program, if not involved in planning strategy; the state Medicaid office; the state health officer; state dental and dental hygiene associations; the state dental board; the state oral health coalition; and policymakers.

Outcome. Understanding of teledentistry.

Examples from the Field. Access descriptions of current ESMs that use this strategy directly or intervention components that align with this strategy. You can use these ESMs to see how other Title V agencies are addressing the NPM.

Sample ESMs. Using the approach “Provide information about opportunities and barriers related to teledentistry to key state and/or local oral health stakeholders,” here are sample ESMs you can use as a model for your own measures using the Results-Based Accountability framework (for suggestions on how to develop programs to support this strategy, see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies):

Quadrant 1:
Measuring Quantity of Effort
("What/how much did we do?")

  • Number of state statutes, practice acts, and reimbursement policies about teledentistry reviewed by state oral health program.
  • Number of educational efforts (e.g., meetings, presentations, phone calls, letters) conducted by state oral health program to provide information about opportunities and barriers related to teledentistry to key stakeholders in the past 12 months.
  • Number of educational resources about teledentistry provided by state oral health program to key stakeholders.

Quadrant 2:
Measuring Quality of Effort
("How well did we do it?")

  • Percent of key stakeholders who received educational resources and indicated that they have reviewed content.

Quadrant 3:
Measuring Quantity of Effect
("Is anyone better off?")

  • Number of key stakeholders who received educational resources who indicated increased knowledge of teledentistry.

Quadrant 4:
Measuring Quality of Effect
("How are they better off?")

  • Percentage of key stakeholders who received educational resources who indicated increased knowledge of teledentistry.

Note. ESMs become stronger as they move from measuring quantity to measuring quality (moving from Quadrants 1 and 3, respectively, to Quadrants 2 and 4) and from measuring effort to measuring effect (moving from Quadrants 1 and 2, respectively, to Quadrants 3 and 4).

Possible Data Sources for ESMs:

Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.


References:

1 Perkins, R. B., Zisblatt, L., Legler, A., Trucks, E., Hanchate, A., & Gorin, S. S. (2015). Effectiveness of a provider-focused intervention to improve HPV vaccination rates in boys and girls. Vaccine, 33(9), 1223-1229.

2 Resources used to establish expert opinion:

3 Systematic reviews of teledentistry:

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.