Skip Navigation

Strengthening the evidence base for maternal and child health programs

New: MCH Best strategies database for sample ESMs

Evidence Tools
MCH Best. NPM 5: Safe Sleep

MCH Best Logo infant in a crib looking up at the camera

Strategy. Multicomponent: Caregiver Education + Health Care Provider Education + Hospital Safe Sleep Policy + Quality Improvement

Approach. Implement a multicomponent strategy that targets caregivers, child care providers, health care providers, and hospital systems with built-in quality improvement components.

Return to main MCH Best page >>

Overview. Preliminary results indicate that multicomponent interventions including education for caregivers, child care providers, and health care providers as well as hospital level-policies with embedded quality improvement collaboratives may help to improve sustained infant safe sleep practices.1

Evidence. Emerging Evidence. Interventions implemented at the caregiver, health care provider, and hospital levels with quality improvement appear to be somewhat effective and have more impact than implementing single-strategy interventions focused on one group. The addition of quality improvement components does not appear to greatly influence overall impact. Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library. (Read more about understanding evidence ratings).

Target Audience. Multiple (caregiver + child care provider + health care provider + hospital systems).

Outcome. Infants placed to sleep on their backs. For detailed outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, click on the peer-reviewed evidence link above and read the "Intervention Results" for each study.

Examples from the Field. There are currently 1 ESMs across all states/jurisdictions that use this strategy directly or intervention components that align with this strategy. Access descriptions of these ESMs through the MCH Digital Library. You can use these ESMs to see how other Title V agencies are addressing the NPM.

Sample ESMs. Using the approach “Hospitals participate in offering staff training on TodaysBaby Quality Improvement: Safe Sleep Teaching and Role Modeling,” here are sample ESMs you can use as a model for your own measures using the Results-Based Accountability framewor (for suggestions on how to develop programs to support this strategy, see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies)k:

Quadrant 1:
Measuring Quantity of Effort
("What/how much did we do?")

  • Number of hospitals participating in offering staff training on TodaysBaby Quality Improvement: Safe Sleep Teaching and Role Modeling.

Quadrant 2:
Measuring Quality of Effort
("How well did we do it?")

  • Percent of hospitals participating in offering staff training on TodaysBaby Quality Improvement: Safe Sleep Teaching and Role Modeling.

Quadrant 3:
Measuring Quantity of Effect
("Is anyone better off?")

  • Number of hospitals participating in offering staff training on TodaysBaby Quality Improvement: Safe Sleep Teaching and Role Modeling who are in compliance with the practice protocols.

Quadrant 4:
Measuring Quality of Effect
("How are they better off?")

  • Percent of hospitals participating in offering staff training on TodaysBaby Quality Improvement: Safe Sleep Teaching and Role Modeling who are in compliance with the practice protocols.

Note. ESMs become stronger as they move from measuring quantity to measuring quality (moving from Quadrants 1 and 3, respectively, to Quadrants 2 and 4) and from measuring effort to measuring effect (moving from Quadrants 1 and 2, respectively, to Quadrants 3 and 4).

Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.


Reference:

1 Macklin, J. R., Gittelman, M. A., Denny, S. A., Southworth, H., & Arnold, M. W. (2016). The EASE quality improvement project: Improving safe sleep practices in Ohio children’s hospitals. Pediatrics, 138(4), e20154267.

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.