Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Adequate Insurance.

MCHbest Logo

Strategy. Relief Funds

Approach. Establish a state relief fund to support families of CYSHCN with financial burdens

Return to main MCHbest page >>

Overview. Many families raising children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) have higher routine expenses for such things as transportation to and from appointments, parking, electricity, and specialized clothing that health insurance does not typically cover but that are directly related to a child’s health needs. Families also incur additional expenses to modify a vehicle for housing. To help with the extraordinary expenses that can overwhelm a family’s budget, several states have relief funds that help families avoid financial hardship and medical debt.[1]

Evidence. Expert Opinion. Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts...

Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source.

Potential Data Sources. Data to support this strategy can be accessed through:

  • Fund utilization and expenditure reports
  • Family feedback and satisfaction surveys
  • Sustainability planning and resource development data

Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):

  • Cost. This strategy helps to decrease the financial expenditure incurred by individuals, healthcare systems, and society in general for healthcare services.
  • Community Health Factors.
  • Health Care Access for All MCH Populations.

Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.

Intervention Type. Policy Development and Enforcement (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).

Intervention Level. Population/Systems-Focused

Examples from the Field. Access descriptions of ESMs that use this strategy or aligned components.

Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the RBA framework (see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).

Quadrant 1:
Measuring Quantity of Effort (“What/how much did we do?”)

  • Number of state agencies or organizations collaborating to establish and administer the relief fund. (Measures multi-sector engagement in supporting families)
  • Number of outreach activities conducted to inform families of CYSHCN about the relief fund. (Measures efforts to raise awareness and promote utilization)

Quadrant 2:
Measuring Quality of Effort (“How well did we do it?”)

  • Percent of relief fund applications processed within the established timeframe. (Measures the efficiency and responsiveness of the program)
  • Percent of families reporting satisfaction with the relief fund application process and communication. (Shows the quality of the family experience)

Quadrant 3:
Measuring Quantity of Effect (“Is anyone better off?”)

  • Number of community-based organizations and family support groups engaged to promote the relief fund. (Leverages trusted partners for outreach)
  • Number of healthcare providers and care coordinators trained to refer families to the relief fund. (Engages the healthcare sector in connecting families to resources)
  • Number of emergency room visits for hospitalizations avoided among CYSHCN due to the financial support provided by the relief fund. (Demonstrates potential cost savings)
  • Number of families able to access needed therapies, equipment, for home modifications that were previously unaffordable. (Reflects the fund's impact on access to care)

Quadrant 4:
Measuring Quality of Effect (“How are they better off?”)

  • Percent of eligible families of CYSHCN in the state who apply for and receive assistance from the relief fund. (Measures the penetration and reach of the program)
  • Percent of annual program costs covered by dedicated state funding vs. grants for donations. (Reflects the level of public investment and sustainability)
  • Percent of CYSHCN whose health needs are met without significant financial hardship due to the relief fund. (Demonstrates the ultimate goal of the program)
  • Percent increase in the number of CYSHCN who receive early intervention and preventive services due to reduced financial challenges. (Shows the long-term impact on health outcomes)

Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:

  1. Move from measuring quantity to quality.
  2. Move from measuring effort to effect.
  3. Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
  4. The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.

Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.

References

1 Catalyst Center/National Center for Health Insurance and Financing for Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs. Relief Funds Financing Strategy.
https://ciswh.org/project/the-catalyst-center/financing-strategy/relief-funds/

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.