Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Early Prenatal Care.

MCHbest Logo

Strategy. Continuous Quality Improvement

Approach. Facilitate quality improvement measures to address clinic-based barriers associated with delayed entry into prenatal care

Return to main MCHbest page >>

Overview. A quality improvement initiative, this study evaluated the effectiveness of reducing barriers that delayed early access to early prenatal care in a federally qualified community health center. (FQHC).[1] Utilizing several different mechanisms to learn about the barriers. (focus groups, surveys, etc), the quality improvements included a clinical redesign, presumptive insurance eligibility for patients, extended hours of operation, improved patient communications, and a simplification of prenatal care services and protocols. The LEAN methodology was used in the study design.[1] Redesigning the standard prenatal care guidelines to incorporate virtual care and remote monitoring provides a more flexible and usable approach to prenatal care. The 4-1-4 approach allows for critical touchpoints for services such as depression screening, anticipatory guidance about childbirth and parenting, and addressing emerging patient questions.[2] The MiPath program. (Michigan) allows for a flexible, personalized care coordination plan and stresses the importance of addressing the social and structural determinants of health and connecting individuals earlier in pregnancy to necessary services.[3]

Evidence. Moderate Evidence. Strategies with this rating are likely to work. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall; however, further research is needed to confirm effects, especially with multiple population groups. These strategies also trend positive in combination with other strategies. (Clarifying Note: The WWFH database calls this "some evidence").

Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source. (Read more about understanding evidence ratings).

Source. Peer-Reviewed Literature

Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):

  • Access to/Receipt of Care. This strategy increases the ability for individuals to obtain healthcare services when needed, including preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services.
  • Timeliness of Care. This strategy promotes delivery of healthcare services in a timely manner to optimize benefits and prevent complications.
  • Quality of Care. This strategy promotes the degree to which healthcare services meet established standards aimed at achieving optimal health outcomes.

Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.

Intervention Type. Collaboration (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).

Intervention Level. Population/Systems-Focused

Examples from the Field. There are currently no ESMs that use this strategy. As Title V agencies begin to incorporate this strategy into ESMs, examples will be available here. Until then, you can search for ESMs that have similar intervention components in the ESM database.

Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the Results-Based Accountability framework (for suggestions on how to develop programs to support this strategy, see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).

Quadrant 1:
Measuring Quantity of Effort
("What/how much did we do?")

PROCESS MEASURES:

  • Number of prenatal care clinics implementing continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives to reduce barriers to early care entry. (Measures adoption of CQI for timely prenatal care access)
  • Number of clinic staff participating in CQI training to enhance early prenatal care access. (Assesses workforce engagement in CQI)

Quadrant 2:
Measuring Quality of Effort
("How well did we do it?")

PROCESS MEASURES:

  • Percent of CQI initiatives using evidence-based methods aligned with national benchmarks. (Measures fidelity to best practices in CQI)
  • Percent of clinic staff demonstrating consistent use of CQI skills to improve early prenatal care access. (Assesses CQI competency among workforce)

Quadrant 3:
Measuring Quantity of Effect
("Is anyone better off?")

PROCESS MEASURES:

  • Number of perinatal quality collaboratives led by Title V established to spread best practices in early prenatal care access who report high levels of engagement. (Measures development of CQI infrastructure)
  • Number of patients reporting high satisfaction with early prenatal care experiences after CQI efforts undertaken by Title V. (Measures impact on patient experience)

OUTCOME MEASURES:

  • Number of regions achieving sustained improvements in early prenatal care entry through scaled CQI initiatives. (Measures population health impact)
  • Number of evidence-based policies adopted to support clinic-based CQI for prenatal care access. (Assesses policy impact of CQI-driven transformation)

Quadrant 4:
Measuring Quality of Effect
("How are they better off?")

PROCESS MEASURES:

  • Percent of CQI teams representative of the perinatal populations they served. (Measures representation in CQI infrastructure)
  • Percent of perinatal quality collaboratives led by Title V established to spread best practices in early prenatal care access who report high levels of engagement. (Measures development of CQI infrastructure)

OUTCOME MEASURES:

  • Percent of regions achieving sustained improvements in early prenatal care entry through scaled CQI initiatives. (Measures population health impact)
  • Percent of evidence-based policies adopted to support clinic-based CQI for prenatal care access. (Assesses policy impact of CQI-driven transformation)

Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:

  1. Move from measuring quantity to quality.
  2. Move from measuring effort to effect.
  3. Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
  4. The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.

Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.

References

[1] Shah JS, Revere FL, Toy EC. Improving Rates of Early Entry Prenatal Care in an Underserved Population. Matern Child Health J. 2018 Dec;22(12):1738-1742. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29992373/

[2] Alex F. Peahl, Roger D. Smith, Michelle H. Moniz, Prenatal care redesign: creating flexible maternity care models through virtual care, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Volume 223, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 389.e1-389.e10, ISSN 0002-9378, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937820305561

[3] Peahl AF, Zahn CM, Turrentine M, Barfield W, Blackwell SD, Roberts SJ, Powell AR, Chopra V, Bernstein SJ. The Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy Prenatal Care Recommendations. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct 1;138(4):593-602. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004531. PMID: 34352810. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34352810/

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.