
Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Early Prenatal Care.

Strategy. Continuous Quality Improvement
Approach. Facilitate quality improvement measures to address clinic-based barriers associated with delayed entry into prenatal care

Overview. A quality improvement initiative, this study evaluated the effectiveness of reducing barriers that delayed early access to early prenatal care in a federally qualified community health center. (FQHC).[1] Utilizing several different mechanisms to learn about the barriers. (focus groups, surveys, etc), the quality improvements included a clinical redesign, presumptive insurance eligibility for patients, extended hours of operation, improved patient communications, and a simplification of prenatal care services and protocols. The LEAN methodology was used in the study design.[1] Redesigning the standard prenatal care guidelines to incorporate virtual care and remote monitoring provides a more flexible and usable approach to prenatal care. The 4-1-4 approach allows for critical touchpoints for services such as depression screening, anticipatory guidance about childbirth and parenting, and addressing emerging patient questions.[2] The MiPath program. (Michigan) allows for a flexible, personalized care coordination plan and stresses the importance of addressing the social and structural determinants of health and connecting individuals earlier in pregnancy to necessary services.[3]
Evidence. Moderate Evidence. Strategies with this rating are likely to work. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall; however, further research is needed to confirm effects, especially with multiple population groups. These strategies also trend positive in combination with other strategies. (Clarifying Note: The WWFH database calls this "some evidence").
Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source. (Read more about understanding evidence ratings).
Source. Peer-Reviewed Literature
Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):
- Access to/Receipt of Care. This strategy increases the ability for individuals to obtain healthcare services when needed, including preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services.
- Timeliness of Care. This strategy promotes delivery of healthcare services in a timely manner to optimize benefits and prevent complications.
- Quality of Care. This strategy promotes the degree to which healthcare services meet established standards aimed at achieving optimal health outcomes.
Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.
Intervention Type. Collaboration (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).
Intervention Level. Population/Systems-Focused
Examples from the Field. There are currently no ESMs that use this strategy. As Title V agencies begin to incorporate this strategy into ESMs, examples will be available here. Until then, you can search for ESMs that have similar intervention components in the ESM database.
Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the Results-Based Accountability framework (for suggestions on how to develop programs to support this strategy, see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).
Quadrant 1: PROCESS MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 2: PROCESS MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 3: PROCESS MEASURES:
OUTCOME MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 4: PROCESS MEASURES:
OUTCOME MEASURES:
|
Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:
- Move from measuring quantity to quality.
- Move from measuring effort to effect.
- Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
- The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.
Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.
References
[1] Shah JS, Revere FL, Toy EC. Improving Rates of Early Entry Prenatal Care in an Underserved Population. Matern Child Health J. 2018 Dec;22(12):1738-1742. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29992373/
[2] Alex F. Peahl, Roger D. Smith, Michelle H. Moniz, Prenatal care redesign: creating flexible maternity care models through virtual care, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Volume 223, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 389.e1-389.e10, ISSN 0002-9378, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937820305561
[3] Peahl AF, Zahn CM, Turrentine M, Barfield W, Blackwell SD, Roberts SJ, Powell AR, Chopra V, Bernstein SJ. The Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy Prenatal Care Recommendations. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct 1;138(4):593-602. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004531. PMID: 34352810. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34352810/