
Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Early Prenatal Care.

Strategy. Interventions to Address Barriers to Care
Approach. Implement interventions that address barriers (e.g., transportation, financial constraints, availability of appointments) to accessing early prenatal care are essential to improve maternal and infant outcomes

Overview. Birthing women who come from non-White population groups are more likely to enter prenatal care after the first trimester. The issue includes lack of available appointments, mental health challenges, substance use disorders, exposure to IPV, and pregnancy-specific conditions.[1,2,3, 6] It is imperative to provide ongoing healthcare provider training beyond clinical skills and techniques to ensure access for all birthing women.[1] Interventions that are woman-centered, include mixed-theoretical approaches, population health theory, and the life course approach that may impact maternal and infant outcomes.[1] Leveraging community health workers and home visiting programs that provide social support, resources, education, and connection to the community has been successful in supporting birthing women to overcome traditional barriers to access and increase their initiation and utilization of prenatal care among multiple populations.[4,5]
Evidence. Moderate Evidence. Strategies with this rating are likely to work. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall; however, further research is needed to confirm effects, especially with multiple population groups. These strategies also trend positive in combination with other strategies. (Clarifying Note: The WWFH database calls this "some evidence").
Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source. (Read more about understanding evidence ratings).
Source. Peer-Reviewed Literature
Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):
- Access to/Receipt of Care. This strategy increases the ability for individuals to obtain healthcare services when needed, including preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services.
- Morbidity Reduction. This strategy addresses factors that can decrease the incidence or prevalence of diseases and illnesses.
- Mortality Prevention. This strategy addresses factors that are associated with preventing death, particularly premature death from preventable causes.
Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.
Intervention Type. Direct Care (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).
Intervention Level. Individual/Family-Focused
Examples from the Field. There are currently no ESMs that use this strategy. As Title V agencies begin to incorporate this strategy into ESMs, examples will be available here. Until then, you can search for ESMs that have similar intervention components in the ESM database.
Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the Results-Based Accountability framework (for suggestions on how to develop programs to support this strategy, see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).
Quadrant 1: PROCESS MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 2: PROCESS MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 3: PROCESS MEASURES:
OUTCOME MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 4: PROCESS MEASURES:
OUTCOME MEASURES:
|
Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:
- Move from measuring quantity to quality.
- Move from measuring effort to effect.
- Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
- The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.
Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.
References
[1] Chedid RA, Phillips KP. Best Practices for the Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Prenatal Health Programs. Matern Child Health J. 2019 Jan;23(1):109-119. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2600-4. PMID: 30066301.
[2] Krukowski RA, Jacobson LT, John J, Kinser P, Campbell K, Ledoux T, Gavin KL, Chiu CY, Wang J, Kruper A. Correlates of Early Prenatal Care Access among U.S. Women: Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Matern Child Health J. 2022 Feb;26(2):328-341. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03232-1. Epub 2021 Oct 4. PMID: 34606031; PMCID: PMC8488070.
[3] Parlier-Ahmad AB, Keyser-Marcus L, Bishop D, Jones H, Svikis DS. Improving Peripartum Care Engagement Among Black Women at Risk for Low Prenatal Care Attendance: A Secondary Analysis of Predictors of Attendance and Sample Representativeness. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Oct;31(10):1490-1500. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0197. Epub 2022 Mar 23. PMID: 35352968.
[4] Sabo S, Butler M, McCue K, et alEvaluation protocol to assess maternal and child health outcomes using administrative data: a community health worker home visiting programmeBMJ Open 2019;9:e031780.
[5] McCue K, Sabo S, Wightman P, Butler M, Pilling V, Jiménez D, Annorbah R, Rumann S. Impact of a Community Health Worker (CHW) Home Visiting Intervention on Any and Adequate Prenatal Care Among Ethno-Racially Diverse Pregnant Women of the US Southwest. Matern Child Health J. 2022 Dec;26(12):2485-2495. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03506-2. Epub 2022 Oct 21. PMID: 36269498; PMCID: PMC9747829.
[6] Janevic T, Weber E, Howell FM, Steelman M, Krishnamoorthi M, Fox A. Analysis of State Medicaid Expansion and Access to Timely Prenatal Care Among Women Who Were Immigrant vs US Born. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(10):e2239264. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2797905