Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Medical Home: Family Centered Care.

MCHbest Logo

Strategy. Trauma-Informed Healthcare

Approach. Train providers in trauma-informed healthcare as a way to incorporate family centered care to children.

Return to main MCHbest page >>

Overview. Trauma-informed care. (TIC) is a framework that requires change to organizational practices and policies[1] that reflect an understanding of the widespread impact of trauma and potential paths for recovery, and actively seek to prevent re-traumatization.[2] In healthcare, TIC usually includes universal trauma precautions and practice changes for patients with a known trauma history. Universal trauma precautions emphasize patient-centered communication and care, often with careful screening for trauma,[3] safe clinical environments (e.g., quiet waiting areas), and shared decision making for all patients.[4] Under a trauma-informed clinical approach, providers collaborate across disciplines, use streamlined referral pathways, and remain aware of their own trauma histories and stress levels when they know patients have experienced trauma.[3, 4] TIC can also be implemented in oral health settings.[5]

Evidence. Expert Opinion. Strategies backed by expert opinion are recommended by professionals and are aligned with established frameworks. These approaches are consistent with field observations and national guidelines, but lack formal validation. Implement with robust evaluation to confirm impact.

Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source.

Potential Data Sources. Data to support this strategy can be accessed through:

  • Training attendance records
  • Pre-and post- training assessments of providers
  • Provider reported practice change data

Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):

  • Patient Experience of Care. This study improves individuals' perceptions, feelings, and satisfaction with the healthcare services they receive.
  • Quality of Care. This strategy promotes the degree to which healthcare services meet established standards aimed at achieving optimal health outcomes.
  • Utilization. This strategy improves the extent to which individuals and communities use available healthcare services.

Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.

Intervention Type. Direct Care (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).

Intervention Level. Individual/Family-Focused

Examples from the Field. There are currently no ESMs that use this strategy. Search similar intervention components in the ESM database.

Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the RBA framework (see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).

Quadrant 1:
Measuring Quantity of Effort
(“What/how much did we do?”)

  • Number of healthcare organizations partnered with Title V that adopt trauma-informed care policies, protocols, and environments. (Shows institutional change and commitment)
  • Number of children and families screened for trauma exposure and related health needs using validated tools. (Indicates the reach and scale of trauma-informed assessment)

Quadrant 2:
Measuring Quality of Effort
(“How well did we do it?”)

  • Percent of children and families screened for trauma exposure and related health needs using validated tools. (Indicates the reach and scale of trauma-informed assessment)
  • Percent of trauma-informed healthcare champions and leaders partnered with Title V who support spread and sustainability. (Indicates the capacity building and movement building efforts)

Quadrant 3:
Measuring Quantity of Effect
(“Is anyone better off?”)

  • Number of healthcare providers who demonstrate increased knowledge, skills, and confidence in delivering trauma-informed care after training. (Shows the effectiveness of workforce development)
  • Number of healthcare visits and interactions with children and families that adhere to trauma-informed principles and practices. (Indicates the fidelity and consistency of implementation)
  • Number of child and family-serving systems and sector partnered with Title V (e.g., education, child welfare, juvenile services) that adopt trauma-informed practices, influenced by healthcare exemplars. (Shows the cross-sector impact and alignment)
  • Number of communities and localities partnered with Title V that achieve trauma-informed designation or certification, with healthcare as a key pillar. (Indicates the collective impact and population-level change)

Quadrant 4:
Measuring Quality of Effect
(“How are they better off?”)

  • Percent of trauma-informed healthcare initiatives that are adequately and sustainably resourced, with braided funding streams. (Shows the investment and financial commitment to trauma-informed transformation)
  • Percent of healthcare organizations and providers partnered with Title V that integrate and analyze population-level trauma and resilience data to inform strategies and allocate resources. (Indicates the data-driven and community-responsive approach)
  • Percent of child and family-serving systems and sector partnered with Title V (e.g., education, child welfare, juvenile systems) that adopt trauma-informed practices, influenced by healthcare exemplars. (Shows the cross-sector impact and alignment)
  • Percent of communities and localities partnered with Title V that achieve trauma-informed designation or certification, with healthcare as a key pillar. (Indicates the collective impact and population-level change)

Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:

  1. Move from measuring quantity to quality.
  2. Move from measuring effort to effect.
  3. Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
  4. The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.

Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.

References

[1] AIR-TIC - American Institutes for Research (AIR). Trauma-informed care (TIC).

2 SAMHSA-Trauma 2014 - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA); 2014.

3 Raja 2015 - Raja S, Hasnain M, Hoersch M, Gove-Yin S, Rajagopalan C. Trauma informed care in medicine: Current knowledge and future research directions. Family & Community Health. 2015;38(3):216-226.

4 CWF-TIC 2016 - Hostetter M, Klein S. In focus: Recognizing trauma as a means of engaging patients. Transforming Care: Reporting on Health System Improvement. New York: The Commonwealth Fund (CWF); 2016.

5 Raja 2014 - Raja S, Hoersch M, Rajagopalan CF, Chang P. Treating patients with traumatic life experiences: Providing trauma-informed care. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2014;145(3):238–245.

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.