Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Medical Home: Personal Doctor or Nurse.

MCHbest Logo

Strategy. Patient Navigators

Approach. Incorporate patient navigators into hospitals and clinics so families receive the support they need

Return to main MCHbest page >>

Overview. Patient navigators, sometimes called systems navigators, provide assistance and care coordination, determining individual challenges and guiding patients through available medical, insurance, and social support systems. Patient navigators are usually employed by hospitals or clinics, and may be fully integrated into a primary care team. Hospitals and clinics generally try to hire patient navigators that come from the same communities as their patients. Patient navigators are most commonly employed in cancer care, often serving low income patients.[1] Most clinic-based patient navigators serve low income individuals in urban settings and work with pre-existing clients.[2] Patient navigators may increase access to care by improving scheduling and completion of appointments for children with autism spectrum disorder and increasing immunization and preventive care for urban adolescents.[3,4]

Evidence. Scientifically Rigorous Evidence. Strategies based on scientifically rigorous evidence are proven effective across multiple robust studies. While success is highly likely, local impact may vary. Monitor outcomes and use data to tailor these strategies to the community's unique needs.

Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source.

Potential Data Sources. Data to support this strategy can be accessed through:

  • Patient navigator activity and workload logs
  • Patient and family satisfaction surveys
  • Patient-reported measures on perceived challenges

Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):

  • Access to/Receipt of Care. This strategy increases the ability for individuals to obtain healthcare services when needed, including preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services.
  • Utilization. This strategy improves the extent to which individuals and communities use available healthcare services.
  • Patient Experience of Care. This study improves individuals' perceptions, feelings, and satisfaction with the healthcare services they receive.

Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.

Intervention Type. Case Management (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).

Intervention Level. Individual/Family-Focused

Examples from the Field. There are currently no ESMs that use this strategy. Search similar intervention components in the ESM database.

Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the RBA framework (see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).

Quadrant 1:
Measuring Quantity of Effort
(“What/how much did we do?”)

  • Number of hospitals and clinics partnered with Title V that integrate patient navigators into their care teams to support pediatric patients and families. (Measures adoption of patient navigation services)
  • Number of patient navigators hired and trained to provide family-centered assistance to children and caregivers in accessing and coordinating care. (Measures workforce capacity for patient navigation)

Quadrant 2:
Measuring Quality of Effort
(“How well did we do it?”)

  • Percent of patient navigators who receive regular training and supervision to enhance their skills in motivational interviewing and care coordination. (Measures workforce development and quality assurance for navigation roles)
  • Percent of pediatric appointments with personal doctors or nurses that are scheduled, reminded, and followed up on by patient navigators to ensure successful completion. (Assesses navigation effectiveness in facilitating care access and adherence)

Quadrant 3:
Measuring Quantity of Effect
(“Is anyone better off?”)

  • Number of hospitals and clinics partnered with Title V that implement technologies and workflows to enable effective collaboration and information-sharing between patient navigators and personal doctors/nurses. (Measures infrastructure development for care team coordination)
  • Number of pediatric care transformation initiatives and learning networks that spread best practices and tools for leveraging patient navigators to strengthen personal provider relationships. (Measures dissemination and shared learning to accelerate adoption)
  • Number of hospitals and clinics that achieve meaningful reductions in pediatric no-show rates, care fragmentation, and preventable utilization through patient navigator programs focused on personal doctor/nurse connections. (Measures healthcare delivery and efficiency impact)
  • Number of communities that demonstrate improved pediatric access to care, health outcomes, and family well-being through the availability of patient navigators and strong personal provider partnerships. (Measures population health impact of navigation and care continuity)

Quadrant 4:
Measuring Quality of Effect
(“How are they better off?”)

  • Percent of hospitals and clinics partnered with Title V that implement technologies and workflows to enable effective collaboration and information-sharing between patient navigators and personal doctors/nurses. (Measures infrastructure development for care team coordination)
  • Percent of pediatric care transformation initiatives and learning networks that spread best practices and tools for leveraging patient navigators to strengthen personal provider relationships. (Measures dissemination and shared learning to accelerate adoption)
  • Percent of hospitals and clinics that achieve meaningful reductions in pediatric no-show rates, care fragmentation, and preventable utilization through patient navigator programs focused on personal doctor/nurse connections. (Measures healthcare delivery and efficiency impact)
  • Percent of communities that demonstrate improved pediatric access to care, health outcomes, and family well-being through the availability of patient navigators and strong personal provider partnerships. (Measures population health impact of navigation and care continuity)

Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:

  1. Move from measuring quantity to quality.
  2. Move from measuring effort to effect.
  3. Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
  4. The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.

Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.

References

[1] Robinson-White 2010 - Robinson-White S, Conroy B, Slavish KH, Rosenzweig M. Patient navigation in breast cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Nursing. 2010;33(2):127-40.
[2] Hou 2015 - Hou S-I, Roberson K. A systematic review on US-based community health navigator (CHN) interventions for cancer screening promotion - Comparing community-versus clinic-based navigator models. Journal of Cancer Education. 2015;30(1):173-186.
[3] Roth BM, Kralovic S, Roizen NJ, et al. Impact of autism navigator on access to services. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2016;37(3):188–195.
[4] Szilagyi PG, Humiston SG, Gallivan S, et al. Effectiveness of a citywide patient immunization navigator program on improving adolescent immunizations and preventive care visit rates. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2011;165(6):547-553.

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.