Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Medical Home: Referrals.

MCHbest Logo

Strategy. Screening Guidelines

Approach. Educate providers and staff about the benefits of early screening, proper screening techniques, and appropriate follow-up care to ensure that patients receive necessary care

Return to main MCHbest page >>

Overview. Guidelines for early screening aimed at primary care providers. (PCPs) such as general pediatricians, family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants can lead to enhanced patient outcomes. The can improve primary care providers' screening and diagnostic skills for autism, resulting in enhanced practice and self-efficacy, and feasibility for local access to care.[1] Implementation of a multifaceted approach in primary care significantly improves screening rates for anemia, lead levels, oral health, and vision and hearing impairments during well-child visits.[2] A healthcare initiative using a screening tool during sickle cell appointments increases referrals to multidisciplinary pain management services by 110%.[3]

Evidence. Emerging Evidence. Strategies based on emerging evidence show promise but have not undergone extensive testing. While these approaches demonstrate potential, their effectiveness remains unconfirmed. Prioritize rigorous monitoring to ensure they achieve desired outcomes for all MCH populations.

Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source.

Potential Data Sources. Data to support this strategy can be accessed through:

  • Provider assessment and feedback reports
  • Patient/family feedback data
  • Provider self-efficacy and competency assessments

Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):

  • Provider Experience of Care. This strategy improves healthcare professionals' perceptions, feelings, and satisfaction with the work environment and systems they use.
  • Utilization. This strategy improves the extent to which individuals and communities use available healthcare services.
  • Access to/Receipt of Care. This strategy increases the ability for individuals to obtain healthcare services when needed, including preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services.

Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.

Intervention Type. Screening (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).

Intervention Level. Population/Systems-Focused

Examples from the Field. There are currently no ESMs that use this strategy. Search similar intervention components in the ESM database.

Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the RBA framework (see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).

Quadrant 1:
Measuring Quantity of Effort
(“What/how much did we do?”)

  • Number of healthcare providers participating in training on evidence-based screening guidelines. (Measures workforce engagement in screening education)
  • Number of patient encounters utilizing recommended screening protocols to identify health risks. (Assesses implementation of guideline-based screening)

Quadrant 2:
Measuring Quality of Effort
(“How well did we do it?”)

  • Percent of screening education programs incorporating case-based discussions and skill practice. (Measures effectiveness of screening training)
  • Percent of healthcare settings integrating screening guidelines into standard workflows. (Assesses systemization of guideline implementation)

Quadrant 3:
Measuring Quantity of Effect
(“Is anyone better off?”)

  • Number of providers reporting increased confidence in applying screening guidelines following participation in educational opportunity. (Assesses provider-reported impact)
  • Number of collaborative networks led by Title V established to foster sustained use of screening guidelines that report high levels of engagement. (Shows knowledge-sharing efforts)
  • Number of healthcare systems integrating screening guideline adherence into quality frameworks. (Assesses system-level adoption)
  • Number of population health indicators showing improvement associated with guideline adoption. (Shows long-term impact)

Quadrant 4:
Measuring Quality of Effect
(“How are they better off?”)

  • Percent of screening guideline initiatives prioritizing needs of communities facing challenges to preventive care. (Measures community focus)
  • Percent of screening resources allocated to providers serving populations experiencing healthcare access issues. (Assesses tailored capacity-building)
  • Percent of healthcare systems integrating screening guideline adherence into quality frameworks. (Assesses system-level adoption)
  • Percent of population health indicators showing improvement associated with guideline adoption. (Shows long-term impact

Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:

  1. Move from measuring quantity to quality.
  2. Move from measuring effort to effect.
  3. Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
  4. The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.

Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.

References

[1] Mazurek, M. O., Curran, A., Burnette, C., & Sohl, K. (2019). ECHO Autism STAT: Accelerating Early Access to Autism Diagnosis. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 49(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3696-5.

[2] Wakai, T., Simasek, M., Nakagawa, U., Saijo, M., & Fetters, M. D. (2018). Screenings during Well-Child Visits in Primary Care: A Quality Improvement Study. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 31(4), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170222

[3] Kingsley R. A. (2020). A Healthcare Improvement Initiative to Increase Multidisciplinary Pain Management Referrals for Youth with Sickle Cell Disease. Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 21(5), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2020.03.005

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.