Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Risk-Appropriate Perinatal Care.

MCHbest Logo

Strategy. Rural Transportation Services

Approach. Establish a transportation system for pregnant women and VLBW neonates requiring higher level care

Return to main MCHbest page >>

Overview. Rural transportation services provide transportation across large areas that have low population densities and lack established public transportation systems. Services may include shared transportation options such as publicly-funded buses and vans running on fixed routes and schedules, more flexible pick-up and drop-off with smaller vehicles (e.g., dial-a-ride and other demand-response programs), for volunteer ridesharing programs. (Mattson 2016).

Evidence. Expert Opinion. Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts, guidelines, or committee statements; these strategies are consistent with accepted theoretical frameworks and have good potential to work. Often there is literature-based evidence supporting these strategies in related topic areas that indicate this approach would prove effective for this issue. Further research is needed to confirm effects in this topic area.

Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source. (Read more about understanding evidence ratings).

Source. What Works for Health (WWFH) Database (County Health Rankings and Roadmaps)

Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):

  • .

Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.

Intervention Type. Outreach (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).

Intervention Level.

Examples from the Field. Access descriptions of ESMs that use this strategy directly or intervention components that align with this strategy. You can use these ESMs to see how other Title V agencies are addressing the NPM.

Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the Results-Based Accountability framework (for suggestions on how to develop programs to support this strategy, see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).

Quadrant 1:
Measuring Quantity of Effort ("What/how much did we do?")

PROCESS MEASURES:

  • Number of rural counties for regions that have implemented new transportation services for maternal and neonatal care. (Measures expansion of access)
  • Number of partnerships formed with healthcare facilities, community organizations, and transportation providers to establish the services. (Evaluates collaboration)

Quadrant 2:
Measuring Quality of Effort ("How well did we do it?")

PROCESS MEASURES:

  • Percent of vehicles used for transportation that are equipped with necessary medical equipment and supplies. (Measures quality of services)
  • Percent of transportation staff and volunteers who completed training on safety protocols and patient care during transport. (Evaluates workforce competency)

Quadrant 3:
Measuring Quantity of Effect ("Is anyone better off?")

PROCESS MEASURES:

  • Number of rural healthcare facilities that have integrated the transportation services into their patient care protocols. (Measures system integration)
  • Number of quality improvement initiatives implemented to optimize routes, scheduling, and patient handoffs. (Evaluates continuous improvement)

OUTCOME MEASURES:

  • Number of pregnancies and VLBW births facing higher health risks that were able to be managed in appropriate level facilities due to transportation access. (Shows clinical appropriateness)
  • Number of patients who were able to attend all recommended prenatal care visits and post-discharge follow-up appointments using the transportation services. (Assesses care continuity)

Quadrant 4:
Measuring Quality of Effect ("How are they better off?")

PROCESS MEASURES:

  • Percent of total transportation service capacity allocated to the most remote rural areas. (Measures resource allocation)
  • Percent of transportation staff and volunteers who completed training to provide respectful, patient-centered care. (Evaluates provider competence)

OUTCOME MEASURES:

  • Percent reduction in gaps for maternal and VLBW neonatal outcomes between rural and urban areas after implementing transportation services. (Measures health impact)
  • Percent reduction in preventable maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in rural areas served by the transportation program. (Assesses population health outcomes)

Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:

  1. Move from measuring quantity to quality.
  2. Move from measuring effort to effect.
  3. Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
  4. The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.

Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.

References

Mattson 2021 - Mattson J, Peterson D. Measuring benefits of rural and small urban transit in Greater Minnesota. Transportation Research Record. 2021;2675(5):356-366.

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.