
Evidence Tools
MCHbest. Postpartum Visit.

Strategy. Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
Approach. Support evidence-based behavioral/motivational therapy that encourages women to attend postpartum visits

Overview. Hospital-based initiatives that combine brief motivational interviewing with evidence-based cognitive-behavioral therapy can increase the likelihood that postpartum women will attend postpartum visits.[1] Several studies using these interventions focused on women with a history of illicit substance use. Evidence has found that women who are motivated to stop using addictive substances during pregnancy are at heightened risk of relapsing during the postpartum period.[2] Factors such as sleep deprivation, loss of health insurance, the demands of parenting, and/or the threat of losing child custody may increase the risk of postpartum depression.[3]
Evidence. Mixed Evidence. Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once with results that sometimes trend positive and sometimes show little effect. These strategies still have potential to work; however, further research is needed to understand the components of the strategies that have the most potential in producing consistent positive results. (Clarifying Note: The WWFH database calls this "insufficient evidence").
Access the peer-reviewed evidence through the MCH Digital Library or related evidence source. (Read more about understanding evidence ratings).
Source. Peer-Reviewed Literature
Outcome Components. This strategy has shown to have impact on the following outcomes (Read more about these categories):
- Access to/Receipt of Care. This strategy increases the ability for individuals to obtain healthcare services when needed, including preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services.
- Health and Health Behaviors/Behavior Change. This strategy improves individuals' physical and mental health and their adoption of healthy behaviors (e.g., healthy eating, physical activity).
Detailed Outcomes. For specific outcomes related to each study supporting this strategy, access the peer-reviewed evidence and read the Intervention Results for each study.
Intervention Type. Counseling (Read more about intervention types and levels as defined by the Public Health Intervention Wheel).
Intervention Level. Individual/Family-Focused
Examples from the Field. There are currently no ESMs that use this strategy. As Title V agencies begin to incorporate this strategy into ESMs, examples will be available here. Until then, you can search for ESMs that have similar intervention components in the ESM database.
Sample ESMs. Here are sample ESMs to use as models for your own measures using the Results-Based Accountability framework (for suggestions on how to develop programs to support this strategy, see The Role of Title V in Adapting Strategies).
Quadrant 1: PROCESS MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 2: PROCESS MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 3: PROCESS MEASURES:
OUTCOME MEASURES:
|
Quadrant 4: PROCESS MEASURES:
OUTCOME MEASURES:
|
Note. When looking at your ESMs, SPMs, or other strategies:
- Move from measuring quantity to quality.
- Move from measuring effort to effect.
- Quadrant 1 strategies should be used sparingly, when no other data exists.
- The most effective measurement combines strategies in all levels, with most in Quadrants 2 and 4.
Learn More. Read how to create stronger ESMs and how to measure ESM impact more meaningfully through Results-Based Accountability.
References
[1] Stotts, A. L., Villarreal, Y. R., Green, C., Berens, P., Blackwell, S., Khan, A., Suchting, R., Velasquez, M., Markham, C., Klawans, M. R., & Northrup, T. F. (2022). Facilitating treatment initiation and reproductive care postpartum to prevent substance-exposed pregnancies: A randomized bayesian pilot trial. Drug and alcohol dependence, 239, 109602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109602.
[2] Rizk, A. H., Simonsen, S. E., Roberts, L., Taylor-Swanson, L., Lemoine, J. B., & Smid, M. (2019). Maternity Care for Pregnant Women with Opioid Use Disorder: A Review. Journal of midwifery & women's health, 64(5), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13019